Skip to content
HeuriTel
Sign in

Operator foundations, CSR teams and employment agencies

Match a job seeker to a vacancy they chose to be seen for

A verified employer lists a vacancy. Two hundred programme members with a matching skill have consented to be matched, in three languages.

No demonstration is configured for this journey yet.

Seen by the customer · USSD, Kiswahili

From the record, not a run: what would reach them, on USSD, App, SMS, in Kiswahili, English.

The case

Annotated from the record

What happened

A verified employer lists a vacancy, and two hundred programme members with a matching skill have consented to be matched.

A verified employer lists a vacancy. Two hundred programme members with a matching skill have consented to be matched, in three languages.

What it reads

  • The vacancy and its requirements
  • Skills, location and availability the applicant shared
  • Consent, eligibility and accessibility rules
  • Bias and exclusion review of the match

Checks before anything is sent

Consent, eligibility, legal basis, minimum group size and bias and exclusion checks pass.

Every option considered, including doing nothing

  1. The match shown to the applicant first, in their languageConsidered
  2. A training recommendation, where the skill is close but not thereConsidered
  3. Referral to the agency, where eligibility is unclearConsidered
  4. No match, where consent or eligibility is missingConsidered

No action is a valid outcome, and it is recorded with its reason. Nothing is computed on this page: the options are the record's own, and no run has decided anything.

Evidence record

Preview
Reference
Issued when a run is saved. An evaluation that was never saved has none.
Decision
One of the options, including no action, with the reason.
Checks
Consent, eligibility, legal basis, minimum group size and bias and exclusion checks pass.
Evidence kept
  • Vacancy
  • consent
  • match reasons
  • applicant's decision
  • employer's decision
  • placement record
  • employment outcome
The measures
Placements made and still employed after ninety days, against matches shown.
Connection
Stated on every record. In the demonstration no operator system is connected, and each record carries that state.

The shape of the record, with no values. A reference appears only after a run is saved.

The improvement, and how it is measured

Hypothesis

A placement still employed after ninety days is the programme's result; a match shown is only its activity.

Desired result: Faster, more accessible and better-targeted public service; improved resilience and resource allocation

Modelled not observed

No figure is modelled for this journey. The mechanism that could produce the result is stated instead.

Authorise purpose → prepare/aggregate → analyse → apply thresholds → agency review → act → log → publish impact and bias checks where appropriate

Observed

Nothing yet. Measurement begins in a pilot’s validate stage, on your systems, against a comparison agreed first.

Geographic/time phased rollout; process baseline; independent privacy and bias review; publish limitations; never infer causal impact without design

Measured on: Response time; queue reduction; service completion; coverage; false alert; excluded population; resource efficiency; public outcome metric

Assumptions, costs and the record’s five answers
  1. 01
    Desired result

    The result wanted.

    Faster, more accessible and better-targeted public service; improved resilience and resource allocation

  2. 02
    Mechanism

    The mechanism that could produce it.

    Authorise purpose → prepare/aggregate → analyse → apply thresholds → agency review → act → log → publish impact and bias checks where appropriate

  3. 03
    Evidence required

    The records kept to show it.

    Purpose approval; data agreement; aggregation test; model/logic version; agency decision; action log; impact/bias review; public reporting

  4. 04
    Costs and risks

    The cost, and the ways it can go wrong.

    Costs: Fixed project + annual managed service; government framework contract; outcome milestone only where measurement and authority are agreed

    If it fails: Withhold unsafe output; escalate to agency privacy/command authority; fall back to official data/process; never expose raw subscriber records

  5. 05
    Measurement approach

    The measure that shows it helped.

    Geographic/time phased rollout; process baseline; independent privacy and bias review; publish limitations; never infer causal impact without design

    Measured on: Response time; queue reduction; service completion; coverage; false alert; excluded population; resource efficiency; public outcome metric

Nothing has been observed for this product. Every line above is the record's own design intent; measurement begins in a pilot's validate stage, on your systems, with the comparison agreed first.

The business side

The change
Placements made and still employed after ninety days, against matches shown.
Running cost
Fixed project + annual managed service; government framework contract; outcome milestone only where measurement and authority are agreed
What evidence supports it
Vacancy, consent, match reasons, applicant's decision, employer's decision, placement record and employment outcome.

The journey in detail

Step by step, from both sides
StepWhat the customer experiencesWhat the operator does
The momentThe moment that started it.A verified employer lists a vacancy, and two hundred programme members with a matching skill have consented to be matched.Reads the vacancy and its requirements, skills, location and availability the applicant shared, consent, eligibility and accessibility rules, bias and exclusion review of the match.
The decisionThe decision to be made.Nothing reaches the customer yet.Matches skills, location and availability to the vacancy within the programme's eligibility and accessibility rules, in the applicant's language.
The safeguardsThe conditions that stop it.Still nothing. No action is sent until every check has passed.Consent, eligibility, legal basis, minimum group size and bias and exclusion checks pass.
The actionThe action that reaches the customer.Show the match to the applicant first; the employer sees a profile only with the applicant's consent, and the agency records the placement. Reaches them on USSD, App, SMS, in Kiswahili, English.Recommends. The system that holds the right confirms, charges or provisions.
When it goes wrongRefusal, failure and recovery.The match favours applicants in the city because the location signal is finer there, and rural members with the skill are never shown the vacancy.The bias and exclusion review catches the skew before the vacancy closes, the location weighting is corrected, and the impact review reports the correction publicly.
The resultThe change it made.What changed for them is what is counted; nothing else is claimed.Placements made and still employed after ninety days, against matches shown.
The proofThe proof anyone can check.Can be answered for, later, from the record.Vacancy, consent, match reasons, applicant's decision, employer's decision, placement record and employment outcome.

Operator systems remain authoritative. HeuriTel reads these to propose an action; it does not decide on their behalf.

Refusal, failure and recovery

What goes wrong

The match favours applicants in the city because the location signal is finer there, and rural members with the skill are never shown the vacancy.

What happens then

The bias and exclusion review catches the skew before the vacancy closes, the location weighting is corrected, and the impact review reports the correction publicly.

The products in this journey

Available to see today

No demonstration is configured for this journey yet.

See HeuriTel configured for your organisation

Verify your work email to open a demonstration configured for your organisation.